notolls.org.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the notolls.org.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host notolls.org.uk. Currently, hosted in Germany and its service provider is 1&1 Internet AG .

the related websites

bromleytransport.org.uk epetitions.direct.gov.uk forums.steampowered.com channel4.com barloworldscs.com dailymail.co.uk users.tinyonline.co.uk cl.cam.ac.uk users.ecs.soton.ac.uk support.apple.com junaio.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

home england figures london m6 toll news road pricing scotland wales edinburgh congestion charge manchester congestion charge runcorn toll bridges aka mersey gateway (page last revised in january 2015) national alliance against tolls was formed in 2004 and campaigns against all forms of tolls including "road pricing" and "congestion charges". when we were formed there were no tolls in northern ireland and there are now none in scotland. all the tolls are in england or wales (including one between england and wales). there are 22 tolled river crossings, the m6 toll, 2 ancient toll roads, and the london and durham "congestion charge" zones. on this page - wins a toll for all seasons reasons why we oppose tolls about us other anti toll sites contact us search site wins skye and kyle against tolls (skat), who had fought tolls on the skye bridge from its opening in 1995, eventually won and the tolls were removed at the end of 2004. edinburgh had a long pro tolls aka "congestion charge" campaign which marshalled massive financial resources for a "referendum" which was biased towards a yes vote. despite this the result of the "toll poll" in february 2005 was "no" by three to one. the government had planned to introduce tolls for lorries in 2008. they said that this would only affect foreign lorries, but it was a trojan horse. the plan was abandoned in july 2005. they claimed this was because of the general road pricing plans, but the real reason was that the costs would have exceeded the income. at the end of march 2006 the toll on clyde's erskine bridge was removed. the government in july 2006 abandoned their proposal for another m6 toll or "expressway". there had been opposition from those opposed to any road building, but we believe that we made the bankers realise that a tolled road was too big a risk because of public opposition to the concept of tolls. the forth and tay tolls were removed from 11th february 2008 making scotland toll free. in summer 2004 the government announced proposals for tolls on all roads or "road pricing". over the course of 2007 this gradually become almost a dead duck, with the credit mainly going to one man - peter roberts - and his petition. the plan was effectively abandoned on 4th march 2008. a scheme for "lexus" lanes - adding toll lanes to motorways - had been announced in march 2008, it was quietly dropped in 2009. the "transport innovation fund" scheme had started in 2005 offering large rewards to local authorities that brought in "congestion charging". the pilot scheme for the greater manchester area was abandoned in december 2008 following a ballot and a two year campaign of opposition. at the beginning of march 2010 the remainder of the "transport innovation fund" scheme was abandoned. apart from "pump priming" money, nothing was ever paid out. in april 2012, the tolls to cross the humber bridge were halved following a long campaign by 'humber action against tolls' and support from some of the local politicians. but as haat said "battle won. war goes on!" to completely remove the debt and the tolls. in december 2013, the government announced that their plans to improve / replace the a14 would go ahead but that the plan to toll it had been dropped. we count this as a 'win', but the naat did not directly take part in this anti toll campaign. in july 2014, the government announced that people living in the council area around a new mersey crossing would not have to pay to cross the new tolled bridge which will open in 2016. this followed a campaign by halton against tolls. this is only a partial win, as the 60% of drivers who live in other areas will still have to pay. back to top a toll for all seasons there may be tolls on:- individual stretches of road , usually going a long distance. these used to be known as turnpikes, though this name survives only in the usa. all turnpikes in britain were made free in the late 1800s; there is now only one significant tolled road, the m6 toll which opened in december 2003. there are some minor roads where tolls are collected, but some are not really highways, and that leaves just two 'ancient' tolls - roydon road at stanstead abbots, and part of college road at dulwich. crossings of rivers or other stretches of water. there are 21 in britain where motor vehicles cross water by a bridge or a tunnel. eight of them are major estuarial crossings - cleddau, dartford, humber, itchen, mersey, severn, tamar and tyne. thirteen are upriver - aldwark, bathampton, cartford, clifton, darley abbey, dunham, kingsland, penmaenpool, pont briwet, rixton, swinford, whitney, whitchurch. zones that cover all roads in a wide area, usually a city centre; those who advocate them call them "congestion charging zones". the best known example is london. there is nominally one other, at durham, but it is only one street. ten other areas had been considered as pilots for national road pricing. only three had submitted full plans - greater manchester, cambridgeshire and reading. the manchester scheme was rejected at a ballot. the other two died when the government pulled the plug in march 2010. all roads . the intention is that all eu countries will have this for trucks. germany pioneered this, introducing "toll collect" at the start of 2005 for trucks, though it only applies to motorways. britain was to also have this but the government abandoned it in 2005. the government (backed by the tories and lib dems) planned to introduce road pricing on all roads, but they had to virtually abandon the idea in 2008. the tory / lib dem coalition took over from labour in may 2010 and most of the lib dems and some of the tories (including david cameron and george osborne) would like to get a lot more money from roads users, but it is most unlikley that there will be significant moves during this parliament. whatever the toll is on it will usually have these three features:- the road will carry a significant amount of traffic - otherwise the collection costs will swallow up all of the toll. there will be no practical alternative - otherwise people will avoid it. people will be conditioned into accepting the idea of a toll - otherwise ..... back to top reasons why we oppose tolls tolls are a regressive tax, i.e. the charge doesn't vary according to income, and thus affects roads users on low incomes more than it does those who are better off. tolls are inefficient - a very large proportion of what is paid in tolls goes into the cost of collecting it. tolls are wasteful - apart from the cost of a collection and enforcement bureaucracy, authorities that operate tolls tend to be overmanned and looking for ways in which they can use up the money as fast as it comes rolling in. tolls are unfair - in most countries, tolls are paid on top of other taxes on roads users - so drivers are paying twice. tolls don't encourage fuel economy or distinguish between cars with different fuel consumption or using "greener" fuels. they lead to more wasted fuel as drivers detour and take longer routes to avoid tolls. it is better to charge for roads through taxes on fuel as this helps to conserve fuel supplies and reduce emissions by encouraging drivers to be more careful with their use of fuel and to car share etc. tolls cause some drivers to make longer journeys on less suitable roads which increases congestion and the risk of accidents. toll collection causes vehicles to slow down or stop. this is annoying for drivers. it also wastes more fuel, and leads to more accidents as the vehicles approach the tolls trying to get into a lane with the smallest queue and fumbling for cash. fully electronic tolls reduce these harmful effects, but do not remove them; and in many cases there is a mixture of electronic and cash tolls which can cause more delays and accidents as drivers detour to get into the correct toll lane. where toll collection is electronic (using or backed up by cameras), then many drivers are treated as criminals with substantial n

URL analysis for notolls.org.uk

http://www.notolls.org.uk/#top
http://www.notolls.org.uk/runcorn.htm
http://www.notolls.org.uk/roadpricing.htm
http://www.notolls.org.uk/#contact
http://www.notolls.org.uk/manchester.htm
http://www.notolls.org.uk/#reasons
http://www.notolls.org.uk/england.htm
http://www.notolls.org.uk/#search
http://www.notolls.org.uk/figures.htm
http://www.notolls.org.uk/#about
http://www.notolls.org.uk/london.htm
http://www.notolls.org.uk/#wins
http://www.notolls.org.uk/edinburgh.htm
http://www.notolls.org.uk/index.htm
http://www.notolls.org.uk/scotland.htm
fairdealforthemotorist.org.uk
scrapthetolls.co.uk
abd.org.uk
tunnelusers.org.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain name:
notolls.org.uk

Registrant:
John McGoldrick

Registrant type:
UK Individual

Registrant's address:
57 Hambledon Drive, Greasby
Wirral
CH49 2QH
United Kingdom

Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 10-Aug-2014

Registrar:
1 & 1 Internet SE [Tag = 1AND1]
URL: https://www.1and1.co.uk

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 08-Jul-2004
Expiry date: 08-Jul-2018
Last updated: 07-Jul-2016

Registration status:
Registered until expiry date.

Name servers:
ns33.1and1.co.uk 217.160.80.150 2001:08d8:00fe:0053:0000:d9a0:5096:0100
ns34.1and1.co.uk 217.160.81.150 2001:08d8:00fe:0053:0000:d9a0:5196:0100

WHOIS lookup made at 18:53:15 17-Sep-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS notolls.org.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

OWNER

  ORGANIZATION John McGoldrick

TYPE
UK Individual

ADDRESS
57 Hambledon Drive, Greasby
Wirral
CH49 2QH
United Kingdom
Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 10-Aug-2014

DOMAIN

  SPONSOR 1 & 1 Internet SE [Tag = 1AND1]

  CREATED 2004-07-08

  CHANGED 2016-07-07

STATUS
Registered until expiry date.

NSERVER

  NS33.1AND1.CO.UK 217.160.80.150

  NS34.1AND1.CO.UK 217.160.81.150

  NAME notolls.org.uk

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .